SEARCH
December 19th, 2009

Lend, lend, lend…

President Obama and Fed Chairman Bernanke call for increased lending from all banks…  The fact is, demand for loans is decreasing for both qualified business and consumer borrowers. Calling out for banks to lend more is akin to pushing on a string… The real question is who is willing to make loans to those that are in need? The largest national banks are using the wide spread in the yield curve that Fed Policy has created to make tremendous returns without having to take any risk in making loans. They borrow at near zero to buy long dated Government backed securities and make a guaranteed spread. On the other hand, community banks like our own North Jersey Community Bank have actually benefitted by taking a larger slice from this shrinking pie of lending… Community banks are currently the only segment of the industry that has actually increased lending, especially to small business.  50% of loans made to small business under $100,000 are made by Community Bankers, as well as 33% of small business loans under $1,000,000.

But as the Administration says lend, lend, & lend, the banking regulators are busy pushing banks to increase loan loss reserves, increase capital levels, increase classification of non-accrual loans, and have made any loan where a commercial building is involved a four letter word.  This pressure is precisely pro-cyclical, reducing capital which in turn reduces a bank’s ability to lend; remember for every $1 in capital a bank has, it can lend approximately $12 while maintaining an 8% capital ratio, a very conservative number. Banks are considered to be “Well Capitalized” when they have Tier One Risk Based capital of 6%, yet some banks are being pressured to operate at much higher levels of 8%, 10% or higher. 

This disconnect has to end. While I certainly understand the calls for additional lending, as well as the conservative stance being taking by regulators, if we hope to help small business in this country, all the interested parties need to get together and work toward a plan that will accomplish a unified goal. It is a known fact that 70% of new jobs are generally created by small businesses, and that the banks that best understand those businesses are Community Banks. Government should create programs that will provide loan guarantees, government debt subordination, tax free interest for community banks that lend, streamlined loan application process, and tax holidays for Community Banks that provide a certain level of increased lending…Regulators need to be a part of this process and create some temporary relief for paying & performing loans that may be stressed, capital requirements for well run institutions, and work in partnership with the Administration and the 8,000 Community Banks that are suffering from the macro effects of the irresponsibly that has produced this economic and financial mess.

Together, we can rebuild our economy and get back on track to create the much needed jobs that have been so elusive…

November 23rd, 2009

All Commercial Real Estate (CRE) is not the same…

There certainly is a glaring difference between the Commercial Real Estate(CRE) loan underwritten for Peter Cooper Village/Stuyvesant Town in New York City, where forward looking pro formas based on non-existent future cash flow took place, and the underwriting of a 20 unit apartment building in our local market, based on a rent stabilized, and rent controlled environment with predictable cash flows, or the commercial office real estate owned by a local doctor group that houses their offices, where they tend to their patients in the community …  Yet the media, along with most of the bank regulators place all of these loans in the same bucket.

The public perception is that all CRE is risky, and that banks engaging in CRE lending are therefore risky, is a perception that is more damaging to sustained growth in our economy than the sub-prime mess that started it all.

The FDIC has created “guidance” that was adopted in 2006 and revised in 2008 that is now being looked at as a “bright line in the sand” by most examiners and regulators. No such line has been created for Residential Mortgages, or any sub-type of those loans.  Our regulators should take a more reasoned approach at creating additional buckets based on risk, and not cut off the only remaining source of funding left for the small business owner on Main Street.  And what happens to the borrower with perfect credit, terrific cash flow, substantial collateral that are approaching the end of their term, and need to refinance? Who will be able to finance their loan? What will that mean to our economy?

The Treasury Secretary talks about how banks should be encouraged to increase lending to help restore growth in our business community. How will local businesses be able to finance their growth, or more importantly how will start up businesses be able to obtain financing to purchase the real estate needed for a restaurant, office, manufacturing facility, etc in this environment.

 Prudent underwriting should always prevail, and the banks that get it right should not have to labor under “guidance turned into policy” designed for all banks which range in every size, and in every state, and in every part of the country regardless of their track record…

November 16th, 2009

NJCB continues strong, stable growth in 3rd Quarter

The third quarter of 2009 continued to show great growth for our bank.  In the quarter, we continued to demonstrate the strength and stability of our bank with profits of $612 thousand, as compared to $480 thousand in the same period of 2008. Also impressive is the growth of our year to date profit of $1.486 million in 2009 from $805 thousand in 2008.  This was clearly the most profitable quarter in our existence, and comes in conjunction with growing our assets from $473 million to $491 million, our loans $343 million to $371 million, and our deposits $398 million to $415 million, quarter over quarter. Equally as important, this growth in profitability and size was accomplished while increasing our loan loss allowance.  While, expecting not to have to tap into loan loss reserves in any meaningful way, the Bank’s management and Board of Directors thought it was important and prudent to build our reserves in anticipation of a further worsening of the credit market. Additionally, and perhaps most importantly, we are very proud of recently achieving and exceeding the $500 Million in Assets milestone.

The continuing freeze up at the national bank level continues to present great opportunities for us.  We have been quite successful in winning business from our local community bank competitors that have “buried their head in the sand” in the hope of waiting out this economic crises. We understand that this is the new normal, and are searching out quality, profitable banking relationships.

Our Residential Mortgage Division is very busy and provides a new source of business development that has positively affected the bank. If you are in the market for a new mortgage or interested in refinancing your existing mortgage, please give us a call.

Our new Headquarter facility is nearing completion, and provides us with the ability to continue to expand, as well as the addition of new services such as a drive-thru and drive-up ATM. We will keep you updated on the progress and timing of this exciting move.

In keeping up with our motto of being “A Better Place To Be” we are working hard to help those who are less fortunate by sponsoring a food drive for the Center for Food Action. Please stop by one our branches for information or call us to see how you might be able to participate. It is times like this that we can truly see the quality of our employees as they volunteer to help in this time of need.

In closing, we are working hard to produce all of these extraordinary results, and we appreciate all the help that our shareholders have provided.

October 5th, 2009

Be careful what we wish for…

In the aftermath of what appears to be the biggest financial catastrophe of this century, it has become commonplace to call for more regulation, more capital, less diversity and less risk. The implications of these calls will have far reaching consequences that may not produce the results that were intended.

In trying to save the financial system, Regulators have forced the mergers and acquisitions of Too Big to Fail institutions which have actually created even larger, and more systemically important institutions.  Expect that membership in the Trillion-Dollar-Plus balance sheets to rise even further, even though there is a cap on national deposits at 10%.

Regulation meant to protect consumers may actually cause higher fees, less options, and the destruction of many smaller community banks that cannot function under the cost burden of all the additional regulation.

The call for additional capital for financial institutions which may be needed for riskier companies, would also serve to reduce lending, and cause the forced mergers of many smaller banks. This mass consolidation will withdraw lending from many businesses and communities that are not attractive to the national banks, and will stifle the entrepreneurial enterprises that need a banking relationship which cannot be described on a standard loan form.

So while the big get bigger, the forces at work are conspiring to stall the formation of new community banks, and make all community banks under $1 Billion in size uneconomical to operate… This is a very serious state of affairs. Ninety two percent of the 8200 banks in the United States are under $1 billion in assets… For small businesses on Main Street’s all across this country, this situation could be disastrous. 

Existing banks will need to absorb most of the products and services previously provided by the shadow banking system, and this may not occur in a smooth and stable process. It is important however to keep in perspective that we will never be able to regulate for every future problem that may arise. In some cases, the failure we are experiencing was not due to lack of regulation, as much as the lack of application of existing regulations…

There are a great number of community banks that have played by the rules, and provide a sorely needed service to our vast majority of businesses on Main Street. Let’s be careful in how we seek to rectify the problems mostly created by the non-bank banks, and not over-burden the banks that will be needed to restart our economy…

August 14th, 2009

Mark-to-Market….”Bayonetting the Wounded”

The Accounting Board’s discussion of a return to Mark-to-Market for banks and financial institutions has the potential to be a disaster to the economic health of our country. Trying to value Level Three Assets such as loans would cause wild swings in the capital base of banks on a quarter by quarter basis. In rising interest rate environments, as we are certain to experience in the near future, bank’s capital would be wiped out even though their loan portfolios are performing… Community Banks which typically have high loan to deposit ratios, and where the majority of their balance sheet contain portfolio loans, would suffer disproportionately from banks that retain no interest in the loans underwritten. Lending would cease in times of irrational or illiquid markets, as would capital investment. Without investment in banking, lending would certainly dry up and the economy would move into a deflationary environment…

FASB needs to carefully consider these issues, and be aware that even the discussion of a move toward Mark-to-Market could cause significant harm to the financial industry, and its ability to raise capital…

Click here to watch my discussion with CNBC’s Larry Kudlow on this topic.

July 29th, 2009

NJCB posts a strong 2nd Quarter 09′

As we move through the mid-point of 2009, a time when many banks have lost their way, and most banks are reeling from mismanagement, NJCB continues set the example for the nation…

Our smart, stable and strong growth has continued to produce impressive results…

  • Our Assets have grown $50 million dollars to $473 million dollars over the first quarter
  • Our Deposits have grown $52 million dollars to $396 million dollars over the first quarter
  • Our Loans have grown $21 million dollars to $343 million dollars over the first quarter

Understanding that our objective is always healthy and smart profit growth, NJCB has posted its most profitable quarter since our inception. Coming at time of continuing expansion, and after paying a significant one time FDIC assessment levied on all banks, we continue to not only preserve capital, with no non-performing loans, but we have consistently increased our book value per share…This distinction is significant and sets us apart from most of our competitors.

The second quarter saw some exciting developments, including the acquisition of Citizens Community Bank in Ridgewood, now our seventh branch, and the starting of Residential Mortgage Division.  The Ridgewood location has created a logical geographic expansion into a vibrant, affluent and business friendly neighborhood.  Our new Mortgage Division, which is also headquartered in Ridgewood and run by Thomas Cosentino, has already begun to generate new business, fee income, and broaden our relationship with our customers.

Internally we continue to expand our product set with new additions such as Positive Pay, International Currency Transactions, ACH origination, Lockbox, Secured Credit Cards, and many more… For more information on these or any of our products please stop in or call us.

While, we still see many challenges in this marketplace, we are continuing to find ways to convert these challenges into new opportunities for NJCB. We appreciate the support and business from our shareholders, customers, and friends, and all the help in continuing to make a NJCB “A Better Place to Be.”

July 13th, 2009

Have you checked your Bank Statement lately??

While the “Too Big to Fail” Banks make the news each and every day on issues ranging from TARP to Compensation, the real story of what is happening to the consumer goes unnoticed.

Have you checked your bank statement lately? Chances are that you are experiencing some of the following:

  • Higher Fees on bank services
  • Higher Interest Rates on Credit Cards & Loans
  • Termination of Credit
  • Termination of products (such as Passbook Saving Accounts)
  • Additional Fees on existing products
  • Branch closures with inconvenient relocations
  • Relocation of your safe deposit box
  • Loss of your experienced Bank Representatives
  • Complete, intentional disruption of longtime relationships

 The same banks that disregarded their customers are now requiring that they pay for management’s poor decisions, and reckless risk taking.

 Certainly at North Jersey Community Bank, we have always put our customers first; and do not take advantage of these times, because we can… We are interested in the long term picture, in enduring client relationships, and in keeping true to our mission of being “A Better Place to Be.”

 What has your bank done?  Do you have a personal relationship with your banker? Have you invested the time to create a relationship with a bank that understands your business, knows your history, and can react to the changes occurring in your environment?

 It is important today to not take for granted your banking relationship, especially if your bank has taken you for granted…

 There are over 7000 Community Banks in this country that are ready, willing and able to put their customers first; after all, that is the only way they know how to do it…

June 22nd, 2009

Rules of the Road…

President Obama has announced a comprehensive plan for the regulatory reform of our financial system, and has made use of the term “Rules of the Road” to quantify the depth and resolve of this plan. I applaud the President, and the Administration for taking this much needed step to address the serious state of our economic crises, and to address:

  • The significant risk posed by the “Too big to Fail” Institutions, and the requirement that those firms are subject to a strong consolidated supervisor, and regulation.
  • A tiered capital structure which will increase capital standards as the level of risk increases.
  • Strengthening consumer protection regulation and oversight.
  • Providing the government with the proper tools to manage a financial failure, and the ability to resolve any size institution.
  • Creating cooperation between and with our international neighbors on the subject of regulation, oversight and capital standards.

 

“Rules of the Road” should provide an understandable framework with which to operate, and create the ability for all institutions to pilot and navigate through the waters of our capitalist system. 

“Rules of the Road” do not, and should not dictate who is in the pilot house, what direction the captain should take, or guarantee the safe arrival of any vessel to any port.

The plan as discussed by the President lays out the proper groundwork for financial reform. The details however, require careful consideration, as they will be the most dramatic changes in our system since the Great Depression.

The expansion of the powers at the Federal Reserve requires another look, in order to maintain the independence of the Fed. Resolution authority has been proven to be effective at the FDIC, and so it would seem logical that this should also extend to systemic organizations. It would also seem to me, that this should be a temporary issue as we should be working to prevent any institution from ever becoming systemically important.

The creation of accountability at all levels of the financial system from banking to mortgages to securitization seems to be rooted in the right direction. It was certainly the lack of accountability that created the mess we are currently enduring.

The creation of a new Consumer Protection Regulator which although sounds like a good idea on the surface, could in fact be counter-intuitive and possesses the greatest challenge to sticking to just  ”Rules of the Road.” This portion of the reform package would un-necessarily burden banks, directly dictate what products can, and must be sold, threaten state regulators, create onerous and complex regulations, and stifle any innovation in the financial space.

We should be looking to be “evolutionary” in our quest for regulatory reform and not “revolutionary” as we hold the ability at this juncture to either overburden all institutions because of the mischief of a few, or support the vast majority of financial companies and banks that played by the rules, created jobs, and continue to provide the financing for Main Street America.

June 1st, 2009

Let’s look before we leap…

Since the founding of this country, the banking system has had its roots firmly planted in the individual States. While the dual banking system actually started with the National Bank Act of 1864, the Federal Banking system as we know it today had its start in the Great Depression, when the FDIC was founded. For over seventy years, we have lived in a dual banking system that has allowed for innovation and competition not only between the banks themselves, but also between the regulators, whether they are State or Federal regulators.

One group of regulators watched over and regulated those institutions that wanted a national presence, and  another group of more nimble regulators, together with the FDIC,  gave smaller community banks a more streamlined regulatory environment, and one in which local conditions could influence policy, and guidance. This system has provided enormous benefits, from competition between the states, regulatory innovation, the allowance for new and alternative ways of thinking, and the determination of what works on a state by state basis.

Because of the recent calamity of events that was spawned by the “Too Big To Fail,” our current administration is proposing a single super regulator for all banks…  This direction is one that needs to be studied carefully, not rushed into, and examined for the flaws that it contains.

The Administration states that it does not look to undermine the dual banking system with a single federal regulator that would have two divisions; one for national charters and one for state charters. That is functionally not workable. What would be the value of maintaining a State Charter? If 80% of deposits are currently held with national charters, what voice would the remaining 20% deposit share of state chartered banks receive?

In the rush to deal with problems caused by the systemically important institutions we need to be careful to not create regulatory monopoly that will stifle any innovation, and could in fact cause a credit crunch. We should all remember that during the real estate decline of the 90’s, Office of Thrift Supervision regulators used their negative experience in New England to mold their regulatory imperatives as they crossed the country, and either hastened the demise of many banks in places where there was not a real estate issue, or created a drought of lending due to their overzealous oversight… We have also seen the value of a system of checks and balances recently with the trepidation by the FDIC to accept the Basel II standards. Had the Fed had its way, we would have allowed for the lowering of capital standards at just the time that the financial meltdown occurred, which would have only exacerbated our current situation.

The combination of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency with the Office of Thrift Supervision by itself would not pose any significant issue in this modern day banking environment. The FDIC should remain as the Federal Regulator for State Chartered institutions, and a new council of regulators should be established to oversee and advise on any systemically important institutions.

The administration should bolster the ability of the OCC and the FDIC in conjunction with the individual State’s Department of Banking to be in the position to regulate, and administer the failure of “any” institution, and not seek to create the path by which the extinction of all Community Banking is certain.

We should also not underestimate the complexity of this issue…

May 18th, 2009

The Responsibility of Lending….

The news these days is filled with concern that banks may not be lending enough, as if it is the banks responsibility to seek out and discover new lending opportunities whether they are needed or not. While it is true that lending plays a very important part of our economic fabric, prudent lending has become passé to some…

 In fact, some of our customers at North Jersey Community Bank would tell you that we have consistently been a conservative, prudent, but understanding lender, and in many cases counseled them to borrow less, by demonstrating that their ability to repay should determine the level of indebtedness, which may have been one of the reasons for their survival in these financially strained times. Some learned that “the best transaction may have been, the one they didn’t do.” Others appreciated the fact that they could rely on us even through these times, as it is better to have a smaller line of credit that can be counted on, as opposed to having a much bigger line of credit which would ultimately and indiscriminately, be pulled because you should not have received it in the first place, or discontinue funding a project because the bank needs to shrink its balance sheet without regard for you the customer,  as some of our  competitors have done.

Equally as compelling is the number of potential customers who chose to go to other banks and financial institutions because the lending was cheaper, looser, without advise, and truly created “a be careful for what you wish for” scenario that has jeopardized their businesses, and may ultimately be the reason for their demise. It is these same individuals who now return to seek our counsel on how to unwind the onerous debt position that they have created.

Both of these groups now understand that part of their banker’s job is to be the “trusted advisor” that we so proudly advertise. We look not just to complete banking transactions, but to create long lasting customer relationships, and as in any good relationship, that sometimes means saying no…

This is a lesson that I believe everyone needs to understand… We have just come though a time when “no” was not an accepted alternative.. People bought houses they couldn’t afford, bought TV’s on credit, went on vacation on their credit cards, dined at restaurants too expensive because they could charge it, and for the most part, spent more than they could ever afford.

Banks, borrowers, and the economy in general, will benefit much more with a sustainable amount of debt supplied to the economy.  It is the responsibility of the banks, all banks, to understand the role that they must play in order to support the economy, and businesses or consumers should seek out banks that look to share, and have a vested interest, in their growth and success…

Both will be much better off…