SEARCH

Posts Tagged ‘Community Bank’

The Responsibility of Lending….

Monday, May 18th, 2009

The news these days is filled with concern that banks may not be lending enough, as if it is the banks responsibility to seek out and discover new lending opportunities whether they are needed or not. While it is true that lending plays a very important part of our economic fabric, prudent lending has become passé to some…

 In fact, some of our customers at North Jersey Community Bank would tell you that we have consistently been a conservative, prudent, but understanding lender, and in many cases counseled them to borrow less, by demonstrating that their ability to repay should determine the level of indebtedness, which may have been one of the reasons for their survival in these financially strained times. Some learned that “the best transaction may have been, the one they didn’t do.” Others appreciated the fact that they could rely on us even through these times, as it is better to have a smaller line of credit that can be counted on, as opposed to having a much bigger line of credit which would ultimately and indiscriminately, be pulled because you should not have received it in the first place, or discontinue funding a project because the bank needs to shrink its balance sheet without regard for you the customer,  as some of our  competitors have done.

Equally as compelling is the number of potential customers who chose to go to other banks and financial institutions because the lending was cheaper, looser, without advise, and truly created “a be careful for what you wish for” scenario that has jeopardized their businesses, and may ultimately be the reason for their demise. It is these same individuals who now return to seek our counsel on how to unwind the onerous debt position that they have created.

Both of these groups now understand that part of their banker’s job is to be the “trusted advisor” that we so proudly advertise. We look not just to complete banking transactions, but to create long lasting customer relationships, and as in any good relationship, that sometimes means saying no…

This is a lesson that I believe everyone needs to understand… We have just come though a time when “no” was not an accepted alternative.. People bought houses they couldn’t afford, bought TV’s on credit, went on vacation on their credit cards, dined at restaurants too expensive because they could charge it, and for the most part, spent more than they could ever afford.

Banks, borrowers, and the economy in general, will benefit much more with a sustainable amount of debt supplied to the economy.  It is the responsibility of the banks, all banks, to understand the role that they must play in order to support the economy, and businesses or consumers should seek out banks that look to share, and have a vested interest, in their growth and success…

Both will be much better off…

Why we should be Stressed over the Stress Tests…

Sunday, April 19th, 2009

With all the talk of the Government Stress Tests lately, I thought some rational explanation was warranted..

First, banks have been required to stress test their balance sheets since their original formation, including any denovo institution. All banks undergo regular regulatory exams which include stress testing of their balance sheets under various, interest rate, credit risk and capital scenarios.

Second, the nineteen banks that are part of the “Stress Test” being discussed could not be in a more varied set of businesses… On one hand we have the largest deposit gathering bank in the country, and on the other, a bank with virtually no deposits or branches, and every other type of business that a bank holding company might have, including investment advice, mortgages, real estate, hedge funds, derivative products, insurance, etc… How is it possible that one test will identify the strong from the weak in this set of banks?

The Stress Test although well intentioned, has added a political side to appease the populist voice being heard by our leaders…

It is clear to me that none of these nineteen “too big to fail” banks can, or will fail the stress test… Instead we will hear about how our banking system is safe from catastrophe, and that some of these institutions may need some additional capital to weather an impending storm. If the institutions are unable to raise the additional capital in the private sector, then they will be able to use a new TARP II funding program.  That’s when the fun will really begin.

Congress is not ready to appropriate more money to this cause; the banks will not like the terms of any new TARP II program…

And once again, we find ourselves concentrating on those that have created this mess, and looking for the best way to bail out banks that should be broken up instead. All this while the solvent, strong and functioning community banks receive no help, and worse, are being forced to pay a FDIC assessment which will substantially reduce not only their ability to lend, but will exacerbate the downward spiral of lower earning, lower share price, and difficulty in raising new capital.

Instead let’s look to support our community bank system and the economy by:

  • Eliminating the FDIC additional assessment altogether
  • Create a tiered FDIC fee arrangement that rewards traditional banks with a lower fee structure, and charges more for the bigger risk takers; peg fees to assets, not deposits
  • Reducing the Regulatory and Tax Burden on Community Banks
  • Incent more lending by allowing 1 & 2 Rated banks to lower their capital ratios; and/or provide a low cost TALF alternative geared toward community banks
  • Support the Federal Home Loan Banks, allowing community banks to better participate with first time home buyers, and those seeking to refinance

 

Our leaders need to understand that it is the community banks that are currently expanding, lending, hiring, and growing profitably which is providing the fuel that economy so desperately needs. Let’s get on with the Stress Tests, and then take a step back, and look to support those that know how to get the job done (our community banks)  and then onto how to re-sculpt the financial landscape so that we never have a systemic risk again…